Beef, Australian, imported, grass-fed, round,… vs. Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat,… vs. Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable…

Side-by-side comparison of nutrient values per 100g edible portion, sourced directly from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's FoodData Central (FDC) - SR Legacy reference foods and FDC Foundation foods (April 2026 release). Each value reflects USDA's standardized laboratory analysis methodology under USDA data-documentation methodology.

Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable… has the most protein of the foods compared, at 22.4 g per 100g.

Nutrient Beef, Australian, imported, grass-fed,… Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean… Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts,…
Protein 21.4 G21.6 G22.4 G
Total lipid (fat) 4.9 G4.8 G4.5 G
Carbohydrate, by difference 0 G0.12 G0 G
Energy 130 KCAL130 KCAL130 KCAL
Total Sugars 0 G0 G0 G
Fiber, total dietary 0 G0 G0 G
Calcium, Ca 4 MG13 MG17 MG
Iron, Fe 2.1 MG2.1 MG1.8 MG
Sodium, Na 71 MG79 MG58 MG
Cholesterol 54 MG63 MG62 MG
Fatty acids, total trans 0.18 G0.25 G0.11 G
Fatty acids, total saturated 2 G2 G1.7 G
Potassium, K -373 MG328 MG
Vitamin D (D2 + D3), International Units -4 IU2 IU

Values shown are per 100g edible portion from Source: USDA FoodData Central Retrieved and formatted by GetFoodFacts Editorial. For interactive comparison of up to three foods with macro bars and charts, use the main compare tool.