CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD vs. RENAISSANCE FOOD GROUP LLC, HAM SUB vs. CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD
Side-by-side comparison of nutrient values per 100g edible portion, sourced directly from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's FoodData Central (FDC) - SR Legacy reference foods and FDC Foundation foods (April 2026 release). Each value reflects USDA's standardized laboratory analysis methodology under USDA data-documentation methodology.
RENAISSANCE FOOD GROUP LLC, HAM SUB has the most protein of the foods compared, at 14.5 g per 100g.
| Nutrient | CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD | RENAISSANCE FOOD GROUP LLC, HAM SUB | CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 11.7 G | 14.5 G | 11.7 G |
| Total lipid (fat) | 14.1 G | 5.5 G | 14.1 G |
| Carbohydrate, by difference | 5.4 G | 20 G | 5.4 G |
| Energy | 188 KCAL | 188 KCAL | 188 KCAL |
| Total Sugars | 0.67 G | 2 G | 0.67 G |
| Fiber, total dietary | 1 G | 0.8 G | 1 G |
| Calcium, Ca | 34 MG | 137 MG | 34 MG |
| Iron, Fe | 0.91 MG | 1.4 MG | 0.91 MG |
| Sodium, Na | 369 MG | 745 MG | 369 MG |
| Cholesterol | 35 MG | 31 MG | 35 MG |
| Fatty acids, total trans | 0 G | 0 G | 0 G |
| Fatty acids, total saturated | 3 G | 2.8 G | 3 G |
Values shown are per 100g edible portion from Source: USDA FoodData Central Retrieved and formatted by GetFoodFacts. For interactive comparison of up to three foods with macro bars and charts, use the main compare tool.