Ham, chopped, not canned vs. Frankfurter, chicken vs. Frankfurter, turkey
Side-by-side comparison of nutrient values per 100g edible portion, sourced directly from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's FoodData Central (FDC) - SR Legacy reference foods and FDC Foundation foods (April 2026 release). Each value reflects USDA's standardized laboratory analysis methodology under USDA data-documentation methodology.
Ham, chopped, not canned has the most protein of the foods compared, at 16.5 g per 100g.
| Nutrient | Ham, chopped, not canned | Frankfurter, chicken | Frankfurter, turkey |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 16.5 G | 15.5 G | 12.2 G |
| Total lipid (fat) | 16.7 G | 16.2 G | 17.3 G |
| Carbohydrate, by difference | 0 G | 2.7 G | 3.8 G |
| Energy | 221 KCAL | 223 KCAL | 223 KCAL |
| Total Sugars | 5 G | 3 G | 1.2 G |
| Fiber, total dietary | 0 G | 0 G | 0 G |
| Calcium, Ca | 7 MG | 74 MG | 148 MG |
| Iron, Fe | 0.83 MG | 1.2 MG | 1.5 MG |
| Potassium, K | 319 MG | 202 MG | 392 MG |
| Sodium, Na | 1194 MG | 1027 MG | 911 MG |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3), International Units | 29 IU | 21 IU | 23 IU |
| Cholesterol | 59 MG | 96 MG | 77 MG |
| Fatty acids, total saturated | 6.1 G | 3.9 G | 4 G |
| Fatty acids, total trans | - | 0.15 G | 0.79 G |
Values shown are per 100g edible portion from Source: USDA FoodData Central Retrieved and formatted by GetFoodFacts Editorial. For interactive comparison of up to three foods with macro bars and charts, use the main compare tool.