Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh, leg,… vs. Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank,… vs. Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable…

Side-by-side comparison of nutrient values per 100g edible portion, sourced directly from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's FoodData Central (FDC) - SR Legacy reference foods and FDC Foundation foods (April 2026 release). Each value reflects USDA's standardized laboratory analysis methodology under USDA data-documentation methodology.

Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank,… has the most protein of the foods compared, at 32.5 g per 100g.

Nutrient Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh, leg,… Lamb, New Zealand, imported,… Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts,…
Protein 20.6 G32.5 G31.9 G
Total lipid (fat) 12.7 G7.4 G6.6 G
Carbohydrate, by difference 0 G0 G0 G
Energy 196 KCAL196 KCAL196 KCAL
Total Sugars 0 G0 G0 G
Fiber, total dietary 0 G0 G0 G
Calcium, Ca 5 MG8 MG24 MG
Iron, Fe 1.5 MG2.1 MG1.2 MG
Potassium, K 210 MG258 MG338 MG
Sodium, Na 87 MG72 MG89 MG
Vitamin D (D2 + D3), International Units 0 IU2 IU0 IU
Cholesterol 59 MG115 MG118 MG
Fatty acids, total trans 0.86 G0.22 G-
Fatty acids, total saturated 5.9 G2.4 G1.8 G

Values shown are per 100g edible portion from Source: USDA FoodData Central Retrieved and formatted by GetFoodFacts Editorial. For interactive comparison of up to three foods with macro bars and charts, use the main compare tool.