Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh, leg, shank… vs. Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh, composite of… vs. Lamb, foreshank, separable lean and fat, trimmed…
Side-by-side comparison of nutrient values per 100g edible portion, sourced directly from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's FoodData Central (FDC) - SR Legacy reference foods and FDC Foundation foods (April 2026 release). Each value reflects USDA's standardized laboratory analysis methodology under USDA data-documentation methodology.
Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh, composite of… has the most protein of the foods compared, at 26.7 g per 100g.
| Nutrient | Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh, leg,… | Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh,… | Lamb, foreshank, separable lean and… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 18.6 G | 26.7 G | 18.9 G |
| Total lipid (fat) | 13.5 G | 9.6 G | 13.4 G |
| Carbohydrate, by difference | 0 G | 0 G | 0 G |
| Energy | 201 KCAL | 201 KCAL | 201 KCAL |
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 16 MG | 11 MG |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 2 MG | 1.7 MG |
| Potassium, K | 301 MG | 318 MG | 214 MG |
| Sodium, Na | 75 MG | 80 MG | 72 MG |
| Cholesterol | 66 MG | 87 MG | 72 MG |
| Fatty acids, total saturated | 6.4 G | 4 G | 5.8 G |
| Fiber, total dietary | - | - | 0 G |
Values shown are per 100g edible portion from Source: USDA FoodData Central Retrieved and formatted by GetFoodFacts Editorial. For interactive comparison of up to three foods with macro bars and charts, use the main compare tool.