Restaurant, Latino, chicken and rice, entree,… vs. Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat vs. Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork
Side-by-side comparison of nutrient values per 100g edible portion, sourced directly from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's FoodData Central (FDC) - SR Legacy reference foods and FDC Foundation foods (April 2026 release). Each value reflects USDA's standardized laboratory analysis methodology under USDA data-documentation methodology.
Restaurant, Latino, chicken and rice, entree,… has the most protein of the foods compared, at 12 g per 100g.
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Latino, chicken and rice,… | Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice,… | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12 G | 4 G | 7.3 G |
| Total lipid (fat) | 5.1 G | 3 G | 9 G |
| Carbohydrate, by difference | 20 G | 32.8 G | 15.8 G |
| Energy | 174 KCAL | 174 KCAL | 174 KCAL |
| Total Sugars | 0.55 G | 0.56 G | 0.46 G |
| Fiber, total dietary | 1.2 G | 1.1 G | 2.4 G |
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 12 MG | 75 MG |
| Iron, Fe | 0.95 MG | 0.66 MG | 0.87 MG |
| Potassium, K | 184 MG | 76 MG | 152 MG |
| Sodium, Na | 518 MG | 387 MG | 473 MG |
| Cholesterol | 36 MG | 18 MG | 20 MG |
| Fatty acids, total trans | 0.06 G | 0.01 G | 0.06 G |
| Fatty acids, total saturated | 1.1 G | 0.54 G | 2.7 G |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3), International Units | - | 0 IU | 13 IU |
Values shown are per 100g edible portion from Source: USDA FoodData Central Retrieved and formatted by GetFoodFacts Editorial. For interactive comparison of up to three foods with macro bars and charts, use the main compare tool.