Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable… vs. Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh, leg,… vs. Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank,…
Side-by-side comparison of nutrient values per 100g edible portion, sourced directly from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's FoodData Central (FDC) - SR Legacy reference foods and FDC Foundation foods (April 2026 release). Each value reflects USDA's standardized laboratory analysis methodology under USDA data-documentation methodology.
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank,… has the most protein of the foods compared, at 32.5 g per 100g.
| Nutrient | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts,… | Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh, leg,… | Lamb, New Zealand, imported,… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 31.9 G | 20.6 G | 32.5 G |
| Total lipid (fat) | 6.6 G | 12.7 G | 7.4 G |
| Carbohydrate, by difference | 0 G | 0 G | 0 G |
| Energy | 196 KCAL | 196 KCAL | 196 KCAL |
| Total Sugars | 0 G | 0 G | 0 G |
| Fiber, total dietary | 0 G | 0 G | 0 G |
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 5 MG | 8 MG |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.5 MG | 2.1 MG |
| Potassium, K | 338 MG | 210 MG | 258 MG |
| Sodium, Na | 89 MG | 87 MG | 72 MG |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3), International Units | 0 IU | 0 IU | 2 IU |
| Cholesterol | 118 MG | 59 MG | 115 MG |
| Fatty acids, total saturated | 1.8 G | 5.9 G | 2.4 G |
| Fatty acids, total trans | - | 0.86 G | 0.22 G |
Values shown are per 100g edible portion from Source: USDA FoodData Central Retrieved and formatted by GetFoodFacts Editorial. For interactive comparison of up to three foods with macro bars and charts, use the main compare tool.