CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter,… vs. Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chicken vs. Restaurant, Chinese, sesame chicken
Side-by-side comparison of nutrient values per 100g edible portion, sourced directly from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's FoodData Central (FDC) - SR Legacy reference foods and FDC Foundation foods (April 2026 release). Each value reflects USDA's standardized laboratory analysis methodology under USDA data-documentation methodology.
CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin platter,… has the most protein of the foods compared, at 18.7 g per 100g.
| Nutrient | CRACKER BARREL, chicken tenderloin… | Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's… | Restaurant, Chinese, sesame chicken |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 18.7 G | 12.9 G | 14.3 G |
| Total lipid (fat) | 15.4 G | 16.4 G | 14.3 G |
| Carbohydrate, by difference | 20.2 G | 24 G | 26.9 G |
| Energy | 294 KCAL | 295 KCAL | 293 KCAL |
| Total Sugars | 0.19 G | 11.6 G | 16 G |
| Fiber, total dietary | 1 G | 0.9 G | 0.7 G |
| Calcium, Ca | 12 MG | 12 MG | 12 MG |
| Iron, Fe | 0.58 MG | 1.2 MG | 1.1 MG |
| Potassium, K | 330 MG | 201 MG | 204 MG |
| Sodium, Na | 871 MG | 435 MG | 482 MG |
| Cholesterol | 42 MG | 53 MG | 59 MG |
| Fatty acids, total trans | 0.13 G | 0.09 G | 0.04 G |
| Fatty acids, total saturated | 2.8 G | 2.8 G | 2.4 G |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3), International Units | - | 6 IU | 5 IU |
Values shown are per 100g edible portion from Source: USDA FoodData Central Retrieved and formatted by GetFoodFacts Editorial. For interactive comparison of up to three foods with macro bars and charts, use the main compare tool.