Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh, separable fat,… vs. Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable… vs. Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of…
Side-by-side comparison of nutrient values per 100g edible portion, sourced directly from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's FoodData Central (FDC) - SR Legacy reference foods and FDC Foundation foods (April 2026 release). Each value reflects USDA's standardized laboratory analysis methodology under USDA data-documentation methodology.
Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable… has the most protein of the foods compared, at 9.4 g per 100g.
| Nutrient | Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh,… | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts,… | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen,… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 6.3 G | 9.4 G | 6.9 G |
| Total lipid (fat) | 68.9 G | 66.7 G | 67.6 G |
| Carbohydrate, by difference | 0 G | 0 G | 0 G |
| Energy | 648 KCAL | 642 KCAL | 640 KCAL |
| Calcium, Ca | 19 MG | 4 MG | 23 MG |
| Iron, Fe | 0.63 MG | 1 MG | 1.1 MG |
| Potassium, K | 112 MG | 173 MG | 51 MG |
| Sodium, Na | 33 MG | 57 MG | 22 MG |
| Cholesterol | 77 MG | 73 MG | 87 MG |
| Fatty acids, total saturated | 35.4 G | 32.4 G | 35.3 G |
| Fiber, total dietary | - | 0 G | 0 G |
Values shown are per 100g edible portion from Source: USDA FoodData Central Retrieved and formatted by GetFoodFacts Editorial. For interactive comparison of up to three foods with macro bars and charts, use the main compare tool.