Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable… vs. Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat,… vs. Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh, separable fat,…
Side-by-side comparison of nutrient values per 100g edible portion, sourced directly from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's FoodData Central (FDC) - SR Legacy reference foods and FDC Foundation foods (April 2026 release). Each value reflects USDA's standardized laboratory analysis methodology under USDA data-documentation methodology.
Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable… has the most protein of the foods compared, at 6.7 g per 100g.
| Nutrient | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts,… | Lamb, New Zealand, imported,… | Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh,… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 6.7 G | 5.2 G | 6.3 G |
| Total lipid (fat) | 70.6 G | 72.3 G | 68.9 G |
| Carbohydrate, by difference | 0 G | 0.62 G | 0 G |
| Energy | 665 KCAL | 674 KCAL | 648 KCAL |
| Fiber, total dietary | 0 G | 0 G | - |
| Calcium, Ca | 19 MG | 6 MG | 19 MG |
| Iron, Fe | 0.98 MG | 0.7 MG | 0.63 MG |
| Potassium, K | 82 MG | 164 MG | 112 MG |
| Sodium, Na | 31 MG | 43 MG | 33 MG |
| Cholesterol | 90 MG | 66 MG | 77 MG |
| Fatty acids, total saturated | 32.2 G | 31.4 G | 35.4 G |
| Total Sugars | - | 0 G | - |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3), International Units | - | 4 IU | - |
| Fatty acids, total trans | - | 4.4 G | - |
Values shown are per 100g edible portion from Source: USDA FoodData Central Retrieved and formatted by GetFoodFacts Editorial. For interactive comparison of up to three foods with macro bars and charts, use the main compare tool.