CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING, CLASSIC RANCH vs. COLESLAW DRESSING, COLESLAW
Side-by-side comparison of nutrient values per 100g edible portion, sourced directly from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's FoodData Central (FDC) - SR Legacy reference foods and FDC Foundation foods (April 2026 release). Each value reflects USDA's standardized laboratory analysis methodology under USDA data-documentation methodology.
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING, CLASSIC RANCH has the most protein of the foods compared, at 0 g per 100g.
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING, CLASSIC RANCH | COLESLAW DRESSING, COLESLAW |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 0 G | 0 G |
| Total lipid (fat) | 55.2 G | 43.8 G |
| Carbohydrate, by difference | 3.5 G | 21.9 G |
| Energy | 517 KCAL | 500 KCAL |
| Total Sugars | 3.5 G | 18.8 G |
| Fiber, total dietary | 0 G | 0 G |
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | - |
| Sodium, Na | 690 MG | 719 MG |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3), International Units | 0 IU | 0 IU |
| Sugars, added | 3.4 G | 18.8 G |
| Cholesterol | 34 MG | 62 MG |
| Fatty acids, total trans | 0 G | 0 G |
| Fatty acids, total saturated | 8.6 G | 3.1 G |
Values shown are per 100g edible portion from Source: USDA FoodData Central Retrieved and formatted by GetFoodFacts Editorial. For interactive comparison of up to three foods with macro bars and charts, use the main compare tool.