MILD CHOW CHOW vs. MOTEK CINNAMON RUGELACH
Side-by-side comparison of nutrient values per 100g edible portion, sourced directly from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's FoodData Central (FDC) - SR Legacy reference foods and FDC Foundation foods (April 2026 release). Each value reflects USDA's standardized laboratory analysis methodology under USDA data-documentation methodology.
MOTEK CINNAMON RUGELACH has the most protein of the foods compared, at 2.2 g per 100g.
| Nutrient | MILD CHOW CHOW | MOTEK CINNAMON RUGELACH |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 0 G | 2.2 G |
| Total lipid (fat) | 0 G | 19.6 G |
| Carbohydrate, by difference | 17.6 G | 45.6 G |
| Energy | 88 KCAL | 370 KCAL |
| Total Sugars | 17.6 G | 39.1 G |
| Fiber, total dietary | 0 G | - |
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | - |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | - |
| Sodium, Na | 412 MG | 152 MG |
| Cholesterol | 0 MG | 11 MG |
| Fatty acids, total trans | 0 G | 0 G |
| Fatty acids, total saturated | 0 G | 6.5 G |
| Sugars, added | - | 39.1 G |
Values shown are per 100g edible portion from Source: USDA FoodData Central Retrieved and formatted by GetFoodFacts Editorial. For interactive comparison of up to three foods with macro bars and charts, use the main compare tool.